SMU Law Review
  • Journals Home
  • SMU Law Review Home
  • About
    • Masthead
    • Write-On Competition
  • Issues
  • Symposia
    • Corporate Counsel
    • Air Law
    • Criminal Justice Reform Conversations
  • Submissions
  • Contact
    • Subscription
    • Alumni
Select Page

The Sovereign’s Invisible Grasp: Katzin v. United States and the Case for Nonpossessory Physical Takings

Jun 1, 2020 | Case Note, Eminent Domain, James Kemp, Property Law and Real Estate

By James Kemp Abstract SINCE Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon, the law has recognized that the government need not physically occupy property or exercise its power of eminent domain to take private property under the Fifth Amendment, instead recognizing that the...

Eminent Domain – Texas Supreme Court Requires Common Carrier Pipeline Companies to Demonstrate Reasonable Expectation of Future Public

Jun 1, 2013 | Case Note, Eminent Domain, Sam Pinkston

By Sam Pinkston Abstract In Texas Rice Land Partners, Ltd. v. Denbury Green Pipeline-Texas, LLC, the Supreme Court of Texas addressed the ability of private pipeline companies to receive classification as common carriers from the Texas Railroad Commission, thus...

Recent Articles

  • Slavery and the Postbellum University: The Case of SMU
  • How Analogizing Socio-Legal Responses to Organ Transplantation Can Further the Legalization of Reproductive Genetic Innovation
  • Achieving Privacy

See More Articles

  • Administrative Law
  • Agency
  • Antitrust and Trade Regulation
  • Banking and Finance
  • Bankruptcy
  • Civil
  • Civil Procedure
  • Civil Rights and Discrimination
  • Commercial
  • Conflict of Laws
  • Constitutional Law
  • Consumer Protection
  • Contracts
  • Copyright
  • Corporate
  • Courts
  • Criminal
  • Criminal Procedure
  • Critical Race Theory
  • Disability Law
  • Disaster Law
  • Dispute Resolution and Arbitration
  • Education Law
  • Eighth Amendment
  • Eminent Domain
  • Labor and Employment Law
  • Environment
  • Evidence
  • Family
  • Federal
  • First Amendment
  • Fourth Amendment
  • Franchise Law
  • Health Law and Policy
  • Human Rights
  • Immigration
  • Insider Trading
  • Insurance Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • Judges
  • Jurisdiction
  • Law and Economics
  • Law and Politics
  • Law and Race
  • Law and Society
  • Legal Education
  • Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility
  • Legal Profession
  • Liability
  • Mandamus Decisions
  • Oil, Gas, and Mineral
  • Partnership
  • Patent Law
  • Policy
  • President and Executive Department
  • Privacy Law
  • Property Law and Real Estate
  • Religion
  • Second Amendment
  • Securities
  • Sexual Orientation
  • Sixth Amendment
  • Social Media
  • State and Local Government
  • Substantive Due Process
  • Tax
  • Torts
  • Trademark
  • Transnational
  • Whistleblower
  • Wills and Trusts

Twitter

Tweets by SMULawReview
  • SMU Law Journals Home
  • The Forum
  • Write-On
  • Twitter
The contents of this website do not represent the opinions or policies of Southern Methodist University or the Dedman School of Law.